You are the owner of this article.
You have permission to edit this article.
Sauk County committee rejects ATV highway routes

Sauk County committee rejects ATV highway routes


Citing safety concerns and a legal loophole involving drunken driving offenses, a committee on Wednesday rejected a major expansion of all-terrain vehicle routes along highways within Sauk County.

The Sauk County Board’s Highway and Parks Committee turned down applications from four clubs seeking to add more than 70 miles of ATV routes along public roads.

The new requests would have doubled the mileage of existing highway routes the county board has approved since adopting an ATV ordinance in 2013.

“The manufacturers of these vehicles specifically state they are not made for use on roads,” said committee member Kevin Lins of Spring Green, the proposal’s most vocal opponent. “But we know better than these folks, right? Or at least some people think they do.”

Lins also expressed concern about a legal loophole in Wisconsin that requires drunken driving offenses on different types of vehicles to be counted separately, rather than being lumped together.

For example, if someone has six prior drunken driving offenses in cars and then gets one on an ATV, they are penalized as if it was their first offense, not their seventh.

That creates an incentive, Lins said, for people with multiple drunken driving offenses to risk operating ATVs while intoxicated. He said he would not support any additional ATV road routes until state lawmakers close the loophole.

A bipartisan bill proposed in the Wisconsin Assembly last year would have made drunken driving offenses on all vehicles cumulative. It received a public hearing and made it out of committee, but never got a floor vote.

Reconsideration request

The applications rejected Wednesday included routes in 15 towns and the village of Lime Ridge.

Only one entity, the Spring Green Town Board, which Lins chairs, went on record in opposition. Other town representatives said they supported or took no position on the proposals.

The highway committee first took up one route separately, voting 3-2 against opening a portion of County Highway G in Spring Green.

Supervisors Lins, Jean Berlin of Hill Point and Tommy Lee Bychinski of Reedsburg voted against the route. Supervisors Brian Peper of Loganville and Dave Riek of Spring Green voted in favor of it.

The committee then took up the remainder of the routes together, and voted 3-2 to reject them all. Peper and Bychinski voted in favor of the expansion.

State law allows local governments to decide whether people can ride ATVs on their roads, streets and highways. Many towns within the county already have opened roads, and local clubs say they need the county highways to connect that existing network.

Baraboo Bluffs ATV/UTV Club representative Bob Spencer said he was disappointed in the committee’s decision, considering that clubs have spent months pushing for the new routes.

In an email to committee members after the meeting, he asked that the panel reconsider. He said he worried that the committee’s action will cause ATV riders to use highways illegally.

“Your decision will cause those who are unable to connect from one part of their township to the other to take the chance on a highway not designated without proper signage,” Spencer said. “The signage is to inform all vehicular traffic of ATV traffic on the roadway.”

Sauk County Highway Commissioner Patrick Gavinski and Sheriff Chip Meister recommended that the committee approve the requested routes.

In a written report, Gavinski responded to concerns about the disruption of highway traffic flow saying that ATVs are not the only vehicles that travel at speeds slower than the posted limit. Drivers need to be prepared for all types of hazards, he said.

Tourism vs. safety

Supporters of the routes say opening public roads to ATVs will bring recreational tourism to the area and help local businesses, such as restaurants, taverns and gas stations.

Pat Werner of the Wisconsin River Runners ATV Club told the committee Wednesday that neighboring Richland County recently approved an ATV ordinance, and that clubs hope to link the two counties together.

“What we’re trying to do is to tie it all together for tourism and everything else,” Werner said.

Federal regulators, safety advocates and manufacturers urge ATV riders to stay off public roads, even if local governments allow access. They say the vehicles are unstable on paved surfaces because they are equipped with soft, low-pressure tires and a high center of gravity.

Laurie Hasenbalg of the town of Excelsior, who spoke to the committee during a portion of the meeting set aside for public comments, said she worried that allowing ATVs on heavily trafficked state highways ultimately would result in tragedy.

“I still find it shocking that even though all the manufacturers of ATVs and (utility task vehicles) caution against riding on paved surfaces, that the clubs keep asking for — and the governing bodies keep approving — more routes,” Hasenbalg said.

Follow Tim Damos on Twitter @timdamos or contact him at 608-745-3513.

Get Government & Politics updates in your inbox!

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Baraboo News Republic reporter

Related to this story

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.


News Alert

Breaking News