“There is no serious person out there who would suggest that you could even rig America’s elections,” said Barack Obama in the weeks leading up to the 2016 election.

Then Donald Trump won the election and “Russian collusion” started thanks to Obama holdover Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates going after Michael Flynn, and successful attempts by the CIA and FBI to plant the bogus Michael Steele dossier among government higher ups — which became a pernicious partisan club to destroy the incoming Trump Administration.

But it was actually Hillary Clinton who was in collusion with Russia before and after that election. The Democratic National Committee, the Perkins Coie law firm, Glenn Simpson’s Fusion GPS, and the Clinton campaign paid a foreign national British subject Christopher Steele to compile a smear dossier against Clinton’s then opponent, Trump. These facts are not in dispute.

Of course the mainstream media, which are insulated from reality, reported none of the above.

Now Attorney General Robert Barr wants to know how this “witch hunt” really started.

Anyone who is for transparency, constitutional civil liberties, and the rule of law want to know why human sources, wiretapping and unmasking were used to infiltrate a presidential campaign and election.

Fred Williams, Baraboo


(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

We welcome reader interaction. What are your questions about this article? Do you have an idea to share? Please stick to the topic and maintain a respectful attitude toward other participants. (You can help: Use the 'Report' link to let us know of off-topic or offensive posts.)