{{featured_button_text}}

I'm responding to Scott Frostman's March 18 column, which appeared in the Baraboo News Republic. He says 16-year-olds should not be given voting rights because, "They have no skin in the game."

They do have skin in the game. They pay taxes. A quick fix for Frostman and his friends who fear the 16-year-old vote would be not to tax 16-year-olds. If you don't want kids to vote, don't tax them. I would hope that even Frostman could think deeply enough to recognize the parallel between taxing our 16-year-olds and not allowing them to vote, and America's war of independence over the very same thing.

Careful. This might be liberal bias infection.

Frostman goes on to say that a free college education for all is "chasing rainbows." Why is an aggressive investment in the future generation -- the nation's future and a true, ethical nationalism -- chasing a rainbow? Everything on this planet that walks, swims, or flies knows there is nothing more important than the future of its young.

Read some history. You will see that a “me first” ethic is not a sin. It's just stupid.

Jeff Monfort, Portage

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

We welcome reader interaction. What are your questions about this article? Do you have an idea to share? Please stick to the topic and maintain a respectful attitude toward other participants. (You can help: Use the 'Report' link to let us know of off-topic or offensive posts.)