Tony Evers says he'll ask state AG to change stance on ACA

Gov. Tony Evers tours Mendota Elementary School in Madison.

Gov. Tony Evers said Tuesday that state environmental officials will review air-quality permits issued last year to electronics maker Foxconn for its planned $10 billion campus near Racine.

Evers told reporters he discussed the topic with Foxconn officials but doesn’t believe the company is concerned.

“Clearly that’s one area the people of Wisconsin were concerned about, is air quality,” Evers said.

Evers’ comments clarify what he told reporters Friday, following a series of reports suggesting the company’s plans for Wisconsin were in flux.

During the campaign, Evers said scientists told him a flawed process was used to issue the Foxconn air-quality permits. The company’s plan to build a manufacturing facility in Mount Pleasant would make it one of the largest sources in southeast Wisconsin for pollutants that create smog. The region already suffers from summer smog problems, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel has reported.

Meanwhile, Assembly Speaker Robin Vos, R-Rochester, told reporters Tuesday that Evers’ plan to cap a state tax credit for manufacturers could send a “chilling signal” to Foxconn and other businesses.

Vos said he spoke to Foxconn officials about a month ago and told them he could “not see any reason why we would be changing this tax structure to get rid of that incentive for anybody in manufacturing.”

Pivot, then not

Foxconn officials did a highly public back-and-forth last week on the company’s plans to build a campus in southeastern Wisconsin that could employ as many as 13,000 workers.

Foxconn officials initially said that they no longer were planning to build a factory in Wisconsin. By Friday, the company walked that back — signaling they will build a Wisconsin factory, albeit a smaller one than originally planned — after a conversation between Foxconn CEO Terry Gou and President Donald Trump.

Republican legislative leaders, meanwhile, blamed Evers for the wavering by Foxconn officials. Vos and Senate Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald, R-Juneau, said in a statement Wednesday last week that the Foxconn changes were “a sign the company is reacting to the wave of economic uncertainty that the new governor has brought with his administration.”

Asked Tuesday how he knows what the company is reacting to, Vos cited a news report published Thursday, a day after he issued the statement.

The report cited three unnamed sources saying the Foxconn changes came after Evers’ administration officials sought to renegotiate “side deals” made with the company by former Gov. Scott Walker.

An Evers spokeswoman said last week that claims Evers “tried to renegotiate the Foxconn contract are false.”

Warning offered

In April, Foxconn got permits from the state Department of Natural Resources for air quality and to withdraw millions of gallons of water daily from Lake Michigan for their proposed plant to manufacture liquid crystal display panels. The permits were issued under Walker, the chief architect of the state’s $3 billion taxpayer-subsidized package for Foxconn.

Evers said during the campaign that scientists have told him the Foxconn permit-approval process was flawed, though he did not specify what problems occurred with the process. Evers told the Wisconsin State Journal editorial board in October that he would be willing to rescind the permits if additional review found Foxconn not meeting air-quality standards.

Speaking Tuesday, Evers said he doesn’t believe state DNR officials have begun reviewing the Foxconn air permits. He said the review was discussed with Foxconn “the very first time we talked to them, we talked about the fact that there may be a review of that.”

Still, Evers insisted Foxconn officials weren’t worried. “I think Foxconn believes that they’ve done what was asked of them,” he said.

Foxconn officials issued a statement Tuesday saying the company “is fully committed to being a responsible corporate citizen and complying with all relevant federal, state, and local rules and regulations that apply to our operations.”

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

We welcome reader interaction. What are your questions about this article? Do you have an idea to share? Please stick to the topic and maintain a respectful attitude toward other participants. (You can help: Use the 'Report' link to let us know of off-topic or offensive posts.)